The representation of youth and youth culture in the media
is commonly exaggerated, misleading and stereotypical. There is constant
conflict between how youth perceive themselves and how others perceive them.
“The media merely reflect identity, they construct it”
(Stuart Hall). The media encode messages in certain ways so that society will
decode it in certain ways which causes moral panics and constructing youth
identities and stereotypes in society. For example, the tabloid, the Daily
Mirror had the headline ‘Yob rule’, clearly stating that youths have taken over
society, causing moral panics and an uproar in society. This would make society
turn against youths. . The mass media construct collective identities
through different forms of media and through Stuart Hall’s encoding and
decoding media messages, for example, in the film ‘Kidulthood’ which was
directed by Noel Clarke, showed society how youths are and that their
collective identity is corrupted, through the swearing, sexual conducts, drug
taking and carefree life. Noel Clarke encoded and portrayed that this was the
kind of youth he had which he represented in the film, however, the society
have decoded the representation of youth negatively and this has caused the
collective identity of youth to be bad. Comparing the way ‘Kidulthood’ has
represented youths to how ‘Rebel without a Cause’ has represented youth, there
are vast differences, for example, in ‘Rebel without a Cause’ there was no
portrayal of youths taking drugs and conducting sexual activities or going
majorly against the law by stealing and being ASBO’s, it was more about being
rebellious in a small extend for example, going out late or sneaking out.
Futuristic films such as Shank, directed by Mo Ali, shows
how youths can be in the future, as it is presented in the year 2015. It
basically shows how society has rejected youths completely that they have to be
in gangs to survive and survive on their own. This can be a possibility as
youths have been represented negatively for some many years and over the years
it has just been getting worse, so in the future society could reject youths.
“Identity is complicated” said David Gauntlett. There has
been a dramatic change in the media in recent years including the Internet and
how youths have utilised this to construct their identity. By considering
Gauntlett's theory, we can see how youths have represent and develop their
identities.
Facebook and Twitter, Youtube and other websites that are
considered ‘user-centred information sharing sites’, are classed as Web 2.0.
This has been used by youths as a form of rebellion against the regulated
society created by the media and generally older people. Regulators cannot
censor constantly updating websites such as Facebook or Youtube so youths use
this to their advantage, to spread their opinions. The Web 2.0 has clearly
evolved and we can see this by looking at the comparison between the
Brixton Riots 1981 and the London 2011 Riots. Through Web 2.0 youths have
started to create, develop and improve their collective identities. Social
networking website such as Facebook and Twitter have become more popular within
youth. It allows youths to use these websites to develop their collective
identity, for example, Richard Jenkins stated that ‘we need to interact in
order to form our identity with other people or with the media.’, he believed
that partaking in an event in reality or virtually with people whom we feel
comfortable with helps us to form our collective identity identification and
aspiration. Similarly Henri Jenkins had the same concept as Richard Jenkins did
as he said, teens are constantly updating and customising their profiles online
to construct and experiment with their identities. To youths social networks
can give a sense of belonging as they would be in a distinct ‘in group’ (Henri
Tajfel). Enforcing regulations and censorship on Web 2.0 is difficult as it
allows users to add photos, songs and postings, therefore, it is hard to
censor.
The London 2011 Riots were planned over social networking
sites and Blackberry Messenger. The rioters used these tools to communicate
with each other and even posted statuses and pictures of themselves with stolen
goods as a ‘trophy’. The communication between rioters in London was much
quicker which made it harder for regulators to stop them. Twitter was even
asked to be shut down because it was being used as a catalyst to plan riots and
Blackberry Messenger was taken down for a few days. These things were not
around when the Brixton riots happened so it was harder for youths to riot in
massive groups.
After the London 2011 Riots, tabloids generated moral panic
which created a sense of fear around youths and readers adopted this biased
opinion. A negative view of youths had been reinforced to the public because of
the London 2011 Riots, and inevitably, the tabloids. By persuading people to
believe that youths, as one big collective identity, were destructive, the
print media had thus contributed to postmodernism and constructed our reality.
They have done this by blurring the boundaries between reality and
representation. Youths were grouped in with, and associated with rioting and
violent behaviour. As Michael Foucault said, being in a collective identity
introduces the creation of stereotypes, and once you are stereotyped, it’s hard
to be seen differently from then on. The only time youths are represented
positively is when they die, as tabloids state how the youth was a smart
student, with the potential to do well in the future etc…
To conclude, youths may be able to relate to films, however,
films over exaggerate and try to generalise the negative actions of some youths
to all youths, which creates a negative collective identity. Youths can use Web
2.0 to create and construct their collective identities, however, some youths
decide to abuse the freedom of social networks and communicate on them to
create riots like they did in the London Riots in 2011.