Social media gives us a sense of belonging as it allows teens to explore and expand their identity. It gives teens a collective identity as the Henry Jenkins theory states that teens constantly update and customize their profiles online and these activities can also allow teens to construct and experiment with their identity.
A collective identity is a sense of ‘one-ness’. It is like a membership in a social group that is collective and has a sense of togetherness. Therefore, social networks such as Facebook and twitter give teens a collective identity as they may be a group of people that like a certain band or artist.
Michael Foucault said that social media is a surveillance in society and is used as a form of social organisation. This therefore, is stating that other is constantly watching teen’s social lives from family to friends. This can also relate back to the London riots as they say that due to social networking many young teenagers got together and decided to riot.
“Identity is complicated – everybody thinks they’ve got one’ this was stated by David Gauntlett, this therefore means that everyone’s identity is complex, however, if someone lives in a communist country, then their identities is said to be the same, as they would have to follow the same rules. For example, China is a communist country as they can only have one child and have to follow certain rules; therefore, they have no identity. This supports the Marxism theory that was started by Karl Marx; it is a communist theory that determines that all members of society will be governed by work and in a class less system. All members of society must follow a governed viewpoint – they must follow the rules, drive the same car, live the same life and we must hold a common perception of each other. Thus, stating that no one would have an identity if they lived like that.
Not only does social media/digital media give us a sense of belonging but it also requires us to pay closer attention to the ways in which media and technologies are used in everyday life and their consequences for social groups according to David Buckingham. Therefore, social media requires us to be cautious to what we do, for example, for celebrities, the social media/digital media at times gives them a sense of belonging and collective identity, however, when they do something wrong, then the media turns against them and make them look bad.
Social media/digital media also gives us a sense of a social identity, as the media is all around us. Facebook, Twitter, Blogger, MSN etc… are all types of social identities as many people use those sites. Henri Tajfel’s social identity theory assumes that individuals strive to improve their self-image by trying to enhance their self-esteem, based on either personal identity or various social identities. Also he argues that there is a distinct ‘in group’ and an ‘out-group’. This is developed in ‘in group’ favouritism and ‘out group’ discrimination. The individuals self – esteem is marinating by being part of the ‘in group’. Therefore, social media gives people a social identity and from there people start to form social groups in which they identify with.
Through social media/digital media subculture and counter cultures are formed, as a social group within a national culture that has distinctive patterns of behaviour and belief are called subcultures. Therefore, people have they own group, which they have identified with, and have a similar identity. A counter culture is a group that runs a counter culture to subvert oppression.
Thus to conclude, social media/ digital media gives us a sense of belonging and a collective identity to a certain extent.
No comments:
Post a Comment